You missed my point entirely. I can tolerate ads. However, I do believe that the actual facts and substance of the article, what you insultingly call “content”, should at the very least outnumber those ads. Two ads for every inane muttering, AI generated sentence, or baseless speculation is too much for me to tolerate. Ads would be tolerable if the article actually added something to some sort of discourse or reported some new or forgotten fact or facet of a story. This domain has shown me that their article will offer neither. When news becomes a wholesale commodity and quantity of content is favored over quality stories, we all suffer.