• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    22 months ago

    I…don’t get it, are you guys sure (Not from Canada lol) a conservative wrote it? What’s the catch?

    • @Kecessa
      link
      72 months ago

      The catch is that the separation of state and religion is seen differently in Quebec compared to the rest of Canada. In Quebec everyone is made equal by getting religion out of public institutions (ex.: a judge can’t wear a religious sign), in Canada everyone is made equal by being allowed to ask for religious exemptions (ex.: turban wearers don’t have to wear a helmet to ride a motorcycle in Alberta).

      Quebec passed a law to prevent certain public servants from wearing religious signs (teachers, judges, police officers…) and the rest of Canada didn’t agree with them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      No catch, but some people don’t like that it affects women who wear hijabs.

      Frankly, I’m not even Quebecois and I agree with the law. If you’re going for your driver’s test and you’re obviously gay, you’re going to feel pretty nervous if your tester is wearing some fundie garb, whether it’s a hijab or a cross around their neck. Worse still if you’re going to apply for welfare.

      • @Kecessa
        link
        32 months ago

        You used examples where the law doesn’t apply, but imagine the same situation in front of a judge and they rule against you…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -12 months ago

          Yeah like I said, I’m not from QC, so I don’t know the letter of the law. But that’s a great example too.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        02 months ago

        Don’t talk on behalf of gay people you know nothing.

        Hijabs are not “fundie garb”. I am not treated badly by hijabi women and have never heard anyone complain of such.

        What a vile attempt to insinuate amnosity between groups you have no involvement in.