MambabasaM to [email protected]English • 2 months agoWe want the zero hour work week!slrpnk.netimagemessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up1288arrow-down137
arrow-up1251arrow-down1imageWe want the zero hour work week!slrpnk.netMambabasaM to [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square65fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•2 months agoYou asked what was said, not what what was implied. If everyone is entitled to a 0 hour work week, that means they are entitled to do 0 hours of work.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•edit-22 months agoYes. There are zero places in the original post where it says “nobody needs to work” It says “We want the zero hour work week!”.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•2 months ago If everyone is entitled to a 0 hour work week, that means they are entitled to do 0 hours of work.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•2 months agoThats a totally different thing than “nobody needs to work”.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•2 months agoNo it isn’t. If everyone is entitled to work 0 hours, then nobody is required to work. They are equivalent.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•2 months agoYou are welcome to disagree with the standard definitions of words, yes. Its not generally advised, but you do you.
You asked what was said, not what what was implied.
If everyone is entitled to a 0 hour work week, that means they are entitled to do 0 hours of work.
Yes. There are zero places in the original post where it says “nobody needs to work” It says “We want the zero hour work week!”.
Thats a totally different thing than “nobody needs to work”.
No it isn’t.
If everyone is entitled to work 0 hours, then nobody is required to work. They are equivalent.
Agree to disagree then.
You are welcome to disagree with the standard definitions of words, yes.
Its not generally advised, but you do you.