• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Communist means ideologically communist. Because “countries which have built communism according to Marx with stateless society with common ownership of means of production” etc are like Zeno’s Achilles and turtle metaphor. Only I don’t get why would anybody use such an unreachable by design criterion to judge on the effect of communist ideology on societies.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Well in the examples I gave only in north Korea everything is controlled by the state. So your point is irrelevant.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            There are gradations between “everything” and “critical mass” as well, and part of it is “private” property which can be easily confiscated or in some other way transferred to a more loyal person, just the system has mechanisms to prevent killing the golden goose (for now, it seems comrade Xi has some ideas with potential to affect this).

            I mean, if you consider Nazi Germany capitalist, then China is too.

            Anyway, it all depends on terminology. Some people think that “war communism” is the closest to real communism the world has seen. For others it’s not communism at all, because they don’t forget that “stateless” part. While Makhno’s republic is that. For others the Nordic countries are almost like communism.

            Just like with Christianity, with Communism we should trace all branches of the tree, not just discard everything we don’t like as schismatic.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Confiscation of private property as a criterion for communism is also new to me.

              Is the Taliban communistic?