• Soulg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    I am not defending her but that is in no way proof of the claim being made. It’s a fictional book.

    Now, if she’s on record saying that, and using them as justification, then that’s different

    • mbfalzar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      In a since-deleted post on her site Pottermore, the writer argued that while freeing the slaves was noble in isolation, being enslaved is what’s better for the elves right now and they should stay that way until they politely ask to not be enslaved.

      https://archive.md/2020.05.08-221547/https://www.wizardingworld.com/features/to-spew-or-not-to-spew-hermione-granger-and-the-pitfalls-of-activism

      I don’t know who the original writer is and I don’t know of an archived copy before Pottermore ended and everything was transferred to Wizarding World, but I believe it’s from an era of Pottermore where she wrote the blog entries herself

    • duffman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Seems like the delight dobby portrayed when he was freed would put that argument to rest.

      • mbfalzar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Nah the actual in universe explanation is that Dobby is weird for wanting to be freed. Literal direct quote from Goblet of Fire

        “But Harry set Dobby free, and he was over the moon about it!” said Hermione. “And we heard he’s asking for wages now!”

        “Yeah, well, yeh get weirdos in every breed. I’m not sayin’ there isn’t the odd elf who’d take freedom, but yeh’ll never persuade most of ’em ter do it — no, nothin’ doin’, Hermione.”

        Hermione looked very cross indeed and stuffed her box of badges back into her cloak pocket.

      • Soulg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Still no, it’s still a fictional story, just because you write a slave character doesn’t mean you’re pro slavery, just because you write a misogynist doesn’t make you a misogynist, etc.

        Again, she still might be, but citing Dobby as your evidence is stupid.