• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It wouldn’t be light enough. Panels weight about 19kg each for a 1x1.7m panel. This can probably be slimmed down for the application, but probably not by enough. Perovskite promises a lighter weight panel, but they still have longevity issues that are being worked out in the lab.

    Why not put those panels on a boat instead? Or in a field and power a train?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Hindenburg used 4x 735kW diesel engines which need to be powered constantly (almost 3MW overall). That is the output at the shaft, which means we need electric motors that match that. Fortunately, electric motors are pretty efficient.

        Thin-film can do 80-120W per m^2. That’s the rating when the sun is shining directly on them. We’ll assume it’s flying above the cloud layer and don’t need to worry about that.

        At the top end, it will take 24,500m^2 of panels. Hindenburg had a length of 245.3m and diameter of 41.2m. If it were a cylinder (because I don’t feel like doing the math on its actual shape), it would have a surface area of 35,000m^2, but that includes the underside. It’ll probably pick up some power being reflected off the clouds or the earth’s surface, but you’re probably only getting 60% of the full power averaged over the entire surface.

        Which is closer than I thought it would be, but not quite enough to power the motors if they were 100% efficient, and dropping it to the real world 85-90% won’t help. Neither will accounting for its actual shape.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          Hindenburg had a cruising speed of 131km/h, so solar electric would just be pegged to a lower top speed assuming we didn’t touch any other parts of the design.

          I think efficiency gains in propeller tech, changes in crew and gear requirements, structural materials, and the rest of it would make it feasible.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 month ago

            Then we have to ask about alternatives. French TGV trains output about 10MW, and can carry over 600 passengers. Three of the solar arrays for these hypothetical green Hindenburgs would run one train, and you’re not stuck with shitty thin film panels. The trains will move twice as many people.

            If we’re talking cargo trains, those max out around 3MW, so just one of these solar Hindenburgs. They will carry far, far more cargo.

            Things like propeller efficiency also apply to airplanes.

            So we’re still stuck where things were going when Hindenburg burned away. Other things were surpassing it, they also improved in the time since, and there isn’t much point beyond novelty.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              Well yeah, for large volumes of cargo land or ocean traversal will always be cheaper or faster.

              If the infrastructure exists, anyway.

              A completely solar electric train would be awesome