• @mindbleach
    link
    English
    21 month ago

    We’re trusting that billion-dollar corporate efforts don’t possess and label hyper-illegal images, specifically so people can make more of them. Because why the fuck would they.

    • @Bridger
      cake
      link
      English
      -11 month ago

      If there was more money to be made than the cost of defending it they most definitely would.

      • @mindbleach
        link
        English
        31 month ago

        ‘Google would love to be in the child pornography business’ is quite a fucking take.

        These assholes are struggling to stop their networks from generating Mickey Mouse even when someone specifically asks for Mickey Mouse. Why would any organization that size want radioactive criminal-to-possess inputs stirred into their venture-capital cash cow?

        • @Bridger
          cake
          link
          English
          11 month ago

          They’re fine with platforming fascists for a buck. Why would they have a problem with kid porn, especially if they can maintain a veneer of plausible deniability