Steven Anderegg allegedly used the Stable Diffusion AI model to generate photos; if convicted, he could face up to 70 years in prison

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/15863526

Steven Anderegg allegedly used the Stable Diffusion AI model to generate photos; if convicted, he could face up to 70 years in prison

  • @zaphEnglish
    0•1 month ago

    Section 1466A of Title 18, United States Code, makes it illegal for any person to knowingly produce, distribute, receive, or possess with intent to transfer or distribute visual representations, such as drawings, cartoons, or paintings that appear to depict minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct and are deemed obscene.

    That’s nice, still illegal.

      • @zaphEnglish
        0•1 month ago

        The thread is discussing why it’s considered abuse if you can’t point to a victim. The answer turned out to be “because the law says so.”

        • @[email protected]English
          1•1 month ago

          If you read the law you posted, it doesn’t actually address the question of victimhood. Also, I don’t really get why you’re still trying to force an unrelated point into this part of the discussion. Maybe find another place in the thread where someone thinks it’s legal and go talk to them.

          • @zaphEnglish
            1•1 month ago

            If you don’t think you sound like you’re saying it’s legal/should be legal I have very bad news for you.

            • @[email protected]English
              1•1 month ago

              Seeing that it’s been explicitly stated that that’s not the case, you strike me as a dude that cares less about the meaning of words than the opportunity to argue about them.