Advocates for the use of trigger warnings suggest that they can help people avoid or emotionally prepare for encountering content related to a past trauma. But trigger warnings may not fulfill either of these functions, according to an analysis published in Clinical Psychological Science.
First sentence
I think the followup is even more relevant:
I really doubt that it doesn’t make people less likely to consume the content. A lot of the time with NSFL stuff, you either don’t expect it or it isn’t described well enough to prepare you. I’ve seen a lot of shit that I would not have watched if there was a warning through the years, shock stuff in comments etc. And I’ve chosen to not watch stuff that had a warning many times, and often see comments saying they won’t watch it either.