• threelonmusketeers
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    the result was improved lives for everyone

    *for everyone who survived.

    I’d argue that the lives of those who died from wars and plagues got much worse, particularly due to the whole “dying” part.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      But not having babies isn’t killing anyone. It’s the best type of population decline. It’s also slower than war/plague so it’s an easier transition.

      • threelonmusketeers
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s also slower than war/plague so it’s an easier transition.

        It is easier, but not without challenges. Each person (on average) caring for four elderly grandparents could be quite the burden.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          WW2 killed the able-bodied workers at the prime of their lives leaving elderly grandparents. Yet the 1950’s weren’t an economic disaster.