The title says it all!

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    We may not all think alike or obtain the same Linux ISOs. I am okay with that and feel we all should be okay with differing opinions and viewpoints, especially in a secular society.

    I defended the comedian Dave Chapelle and questioned the term “toxic masculinity” in 2 posts which lead to a long (and apparently scrutinized) comment history.

    • Night Monkey
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Based comment history. If I had any invites left I would have given it to you. I can’t stand people who stalk people’s comment history. It’s friggin stupid

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 month ago

        Thanks. We reached that dystopian part where people are judged based on their social credits and “likability” and conformance index to the masses.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I expect to be held liable for people I invite to other people’s places, therefore I don’t invite randos or people that have proven to have little regard for others.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 month ago

          Invitations and referrals do carry liability. However, I would say that if you have a differing opinion, others attack with little regard. The “mob mentality” is inert and affluent in social media. Then you are left to defend your differing viewpoint, leaving a trail of more dissenting comments which are also attacked to the nth degree. I honestly thought this federated experiment would be different. I was wrong.