the company says that Recall will be opt-in by default, so users will need to decide to turn it on

  • Lizardking13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    Internally people probably talked about how there were huge issues. Others probably said those issues are over stated and it’s no big deal. They decided to release it and the press says there are issues. Then, the company decides there are issues. That simple.

    • CancerMancer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Having been the guy in an org shouting not to do something only for it to come back to us this way, the finger-pointing that begins is nuts. Often the people who tried to stop the “feature” from rolling out are the first to get blamed for it being shit.

      Classic CYA, make sure everything you said is in writing somewhere.

      • Lizardking13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I have as well. I won’t pretend I’m always right - I’ve thought some ideas that worked out incredibly were horrible. Also had the situation you describe happen. It’s okay when you’re working with reasonable people. Show them the slide deck, the email, the analysis, whatever… “Look you didn’t approve this”. "Here is an alternative ". That can work.

        Just telling folks “I told you so” isn’t usually a great form of communication.