• tillary
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I’m sure in America there would be a massive power struggle over which party would have majority control over the judicial review board. Agree with term limits though.

    • slickgoat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s the thing. If political parties are involved it leads to corruption. It has to. The idea is to remove political interference. Let the law stand for itself without parties pushing it their preferred direction.

      I know that this is probably impossible now in the US. It is probably even too big of a change to get your head around, However, such a system is common place around democracies.

      • tillary
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        The difference between the US and other countries is that there’s more financial incentive to having political control in the US. Companies here have way too much freedom to exploit under the current system and a lot of money they can invest in keeping it that way. Whether that means bribing justices or building platforms for Ben Shapiros or making big donations to campaigns.

        There’s a way out for the US I think. We need to get people in office whose goal is to remove the incentives. Take money out of politics (no more donations, lobbying). Laws should be decided based on merit and debate alone, and if it’s not near unanimous in the courts it should be a citizen vote.