• Possibly linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    315 days ago

    By doing this they are setting a strong presence. You either can have full Firefox or no Firefox. It isn’t right to censor for specific countries.

    It is the same thing with EU chat control and Signal.

    • @sugar_in_your_tea
      link
      314 days ago

      Idk, I think an addon store is different. Some regions could restrict certain types of addons (e.g. porn, gambling, crypto, language support, etc), and that should be fine. They shouldn’t compromise on core Firefox features, but I think region-gating extensions is fine, provided they have a way to side-load extensions.

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        214 days ago

        We aren’t talking about gambling here we are talking about massive censorship and attacks on human rights.

        • @sugar_in_your_tea
          link
          114 days ago

          It’s the same general idea. Blocking gambling add-ons is just another form of censorship. As long as countries aren’t dictating core browser features, I don’t see why Mozilla shouldn’t comply with blocking access to certain third-party add-ons in their add-on store, but they should allow users to select third-party add-on repos if they so choose (afaik, that’s not a thing yet).

          • Possibly linux
            link
            fedilink
            English
            014 days ago

            Gambling has nothing to do with Democratic speech and access to information. We are talking about add ons that might show people the truth. Russia and Putin fear that greatly.