• Imgonnatrythis
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Garbage article. There is scientific data and this isn’t a restriction. It’s an educational label. I don’t imagine it will be particularly effective, but it strips no one of any rights. I’d rather see something like what they do on ciggy boxes in Europe with lung cancer photos on the box, but maybe with a picture of an obese depressed kid or something.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      There is scientific data

      Citations needed. 1, 2, 3

      It’s an educational label.

      Citations needed.

      maybe with a picture of an obese depressed kid or something.

      People will happily recycle pseudo-science if it confirms their own gross bias.

      • Imgonnatrythis
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Have you bothered to actually read the SGs advisory? It’s full of high quality citations or what predators lurking on X looking for underage children refer to as pseudo-science.