• @eestileib
    link
    308 days ago

    This is presumably being done in collaboration with the supreme court to give them a test case to permit establishment of the Christian religion in schools.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -47 days ago

      Well that would be pretty difficult, they’d have to pretend like the 1st Amendment doesn’t exist. Don’t forget that they’ve all had to take the oath of office requiring them to swear to uphold the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -27 days ago

          Nope, completely serious.

          Maybe it’s time you realized that what you’re saying is a conspiracy theory, literally. That is what the trumptards do, as they are addicted to turning everything they’re worried about into a conspiracy theory against them. But not everything is a conspiracy, most things are not.

          • @eestileib
            link
            17 days ago

            If you think that SCOTUS is not signaling the kinds of cases they want to get (at, say, Federalist Society meetings and speeches), you’re not paying attention.

            The electors plot and preparation for the J6 coup attempt were also conspiracies.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              16 days ago

              With the Big Lie election conspiracy and Jan. 6th we had clear indications visible to the public and documented communications outlining their conspiracies.

              What you’re promoting now is a conspiracy theory that Louisiana lawmakers are conspiring with the Supreme Court justices to legalize Christian theocracy. Where is the documentation to back up your conspiracy theory? Can you list any examples of publicly visible collusion, communications between those parties?