@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • 12 days agoSomeone escaped the Matrixlemmy.worldimagemessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1648arrow-down18
arrow-up1640arrow-down1imageSomeone escaped the Matrixlemmy.world@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • 12 days agomessage-square52fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink28•11 days agoWait is he still on the Azure Performance team?
minus-squareRentlarlinkfedilink37•11 days agoAzure needs him to care for Microsoft’s Golden Goose at his farm.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink13•11 days agoNope. If he hadn’t quit, it would say “present” instead of July 2024
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish12•11 days agoLook under “Principal Software Development Engineer.” It says “2017-present”
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•11 days agoThat’s the basis for my claim actually. The other position has a date not the word “present”. Which I now realize includes 2023 not this year, so I don’t know what the original question was getting at.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•edit-211 days agoBut…it says “august 2017-present” on the screenshot I’m looking at? Right? Also, isn’t July 2024 like, next month?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•11 days agoIt says 2023, not 24. Commenter typo’d. and the top number is correct. Bottom one is probably custom filled out, not based on actual work history.
Reminds of that post a month ago…
Wait is he still on the Azure Performance team?
Azure needs him to care for Microsoft’s Golden Goose at his farm.
Nope. If he hadn’t quit, it would say “present” instead of July 2024
Look under “Principal Software Development Engineer.” It says “2017-present”
That’s the basis for my claim actually. The other position has a date not the word “present”. Which I now realize includes 2023 not this year, so I don’t know what the original question was getting at.
But…it says “august 2017-present” on the screenshot I’m looking at? Right? Also, isn’t July 2024 like, next month?
It says 2023, not 24. Commenter typo’d. and the top number is correct. Bottom one is probably custom filled out, not based on actual work history.