• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      18
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      They sell AirTag location data? I honestly find that hard to believe. What’s your source on this other than big tech bad?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        912 days ago

        Right, apple definitely doesn’t have access to the info on the products they make and sell to the public.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1912 days ago

            Have you verified their encryption method? Where is the source code? Where is the third party public audit that verifies that it’s implemented properly with no other means of access?

            Blindly trusting that they say it’s encrypted is basically the same as no encryption

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                012 days ago

                I mean, None of these appeared to specifically be about the air tag. But it is at least does help show a general overall commitment to security. So it’s not as if it’s not a huge point in favor of trusting that the airtag data is safe

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              212 days ago

              On top of being privacy focused themselves, they are only working with AI parters who also pass a third party code review verifying that zero user data is stored.

              Shit on Apple for not being repairable, sure. Shit on Apple for their walled garden, sure. But shitting on Apple over privacy is insane. They are they only big tech company that actually cares.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                211 days ago

                I used to hold the same opinion you do, but after reading this article, reality caught up with me:

                https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/17/technology/apple-china-censorship-data.html

                If you want a shorter version of this that puts the consequences into perspective, I recommend one of Cory Doctorow’s blog posts: https://pluralistic.net/2021/05/18/unhealthy-balance-sheet/#think-manorialism

                Taking the above behavior into account, Apple’s value proposition for anyone that cares about digital sovereignty is extremely brittle. I’ve decided not to invest any further into their tech. Is it the worst evil that roams earth? No. But does it logically follow that you should defend all their practices? Also no.

                After reading the above, it shouldn’t surprise your that Apple spies on their users too, if only a bit less than, say, Facebook/Meta: https://pluralistic.net/2022/11/14/luxury-surveillance/#liar-liar

                Hope you can approach this with an open mind. I know it’s hard, I certainly didn’t want to start doubting what I thought was a valiant defender of consumer privacy. Cases like the San Bernardino shooter were testaments for Apple’s commitment to me. It turns out that’s only half the story though.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  112 days ago

                  Source? As far as I know they didn’t claim to not know location until iOS 17 release. Up until then they could access that info, and were required to give it up provided with warrants. This has been a reason Apple has actively been limiting the data they have access to. They cannot be compelled to give up data they have no way of accessing.