• Enkrod
    link
    fedilink
    English
    28 days ago

    Oh I am cognizant of the fact that not necessarily skin-color is the fulcrum of real, existing medieval racism (it’s rather a different kind of racism/culturalism and it does declare for example jews and muslims to be subhumans (source)) but I’m talking completely RPG-worlds here, with all their baggage and misunderstandings.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 days ago

        Then look at Sir Moriaen, a knight in Arthurian canon.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moriaen

        That the social constructs around race change over time and that our modern understanding is different is not the same thing as our ancestors not being something we couldn’t call racist.

        Sir Moriaen’s story is particularly interesting historically because it demonstrates both a clear racist fear response and a clear moral that it is wrong, and Sir Moriaen should instead be judged by his having better, noble blood and being a good Christian, not the color of his skin.

        Okay, one might note a whole other topic of discussion there, but the point remains, tribalism and heirarchy are the root of all prejudice, and they weren’t invented by Portuguese slave traders.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38 days ago

          Okay, one might note a whole other topic of discussion there, but the point remains, tribalism and heirarchy are the root of all prejudice, and they weren’t invented by Portuguese slave traders.

          That’s kind of what I’m getting at, man. Tribalism and hierarchy are related to racism, but calling all prejudices racism makes the term so broad as to be borderline useless. Racism, as we would recognize it, dates to the early modern period.