@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agoCursed wretched marketingmander.xyzimagemessage-square147fedilinkarrow-up1971arrow-down152cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1919arrow-down1imageCursed wretched marketingmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agomessage-square147fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoYou disputed that right here: It’s not accurate to say we were all looking at the same image with the dress. Why would you bring this up if not because of my comment?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-23 months agoI’m saying I didn’t dispute the optical illusions/visual fuckery occurring. That’s not incompatible with the other contributing factors I listed. Does that make sense?
You disputed that right here:
Why would you bring this up if not because of my comment?
I’m saying I didn’t dispute the optical illusions/visual fuckery occurring. That’s not incompatible with the other contributing factors I listed. Does that make sense?