My original question was “How do we disincentivize the purchase of pickup trucks/SUVs” but then I thought it would be better to approach the larger problem of car dependency and car ownership. One option is, of course, to create public transit infrastructure and improve it where it already exist. This, however, doesn’t change the fact that some will still choose to drive. What would be the best ways to discourage people from owning personal cars?

  • @Ookami38
    link
    English
    31 month ago

    You can own your car and drive it from time to time, ideally not in the city. Those aren’t what we want to discourage. Discourage driving daily, driving in the city. Make those things simply easier, faster, and cheaper to do than using a car, and, while it won’t KILL cars completely, it’ll reduce them enough to make a noticeable difference.

    After that’s successful, and the working class hasn’t completely shit themselves, we can start with making cars less desirable than they are right now. Once only the enthusiasts and most stubborn own a car, we can add some kinds of taxes, so that at the end, we’re left with only the enthusiasts, which I think is a perfectly reasonable goal.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yes, but you must also do things like add tolls, rush surcharges, etc to actually get the car usage down.

      Simply making the alternative better alone won’t make the majority drop the comfort of their own car because it will never be as good as driving yourself.

      • @Ookami38
        link
        English
        11 month ago

        Pretty sure my second paragraph, starting with the word “after” (that word does a LOT of lifting) addresses that aspect.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          It usually happens at the same time, you increase cost. Then you use that cost directly to build and maintain the public infrastructure required.

          • @Ookami38
            link
            English
            11 month ago

            I’m aware of that being how it usually happens. The problem is, relying on that leaves a lot of people out to dry. Spend a bit now, so that we can make the transition smoother and more likely to happen at all.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              I agree, I’m also colored by living in Norway where we are way ahead of America in this process. It’s been very gradual indeed.

              But it is fair that people using the roads pay for them

              • @Ookami38
                link
                English
                11 month ago

                Sure, I can agree with the people using them paying for the roads. I just don’t want to see it go from what we have currently to something much MUCH worse for your average individual, which if we do these things without setting up safety nets first, they will be.

      • ASeriesOfPoorChoices
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        no, you don’t. that’s all a poor tax, again.

        and remember: most of the people who need cars (for mobility reasons) are among the poorest.

        So taxing people through tolls and such is just punishing the disabled. ie ableist.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          You do if you actually want the traffic to go down and you want to afford the public transportation infrastructure that will be required.

          • ASeriesOfPoorChoices
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            in short, you’re not good at math and have no idea the cost of public works if you think they’re on the same scale.

            (also, it doesn’t address the ableism)