• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -122 months ago

    No, of course not. Why have all that RAM and not use any of it? This is a very common misunderstanding.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 months ago

      This is true but only to a point. I have 64GB of RAM and I have seen Photoshop overshoot that and start eating up 20gb of page file. Working with the exact same files in Affinity Photo - it uses a quarter of that.

      There is a difference between “Efficiently use available memory for program functions” and “Fill all available memory with bloat and poorly coded rubbish”

      If your software’s function can be replicated using only 1/4 of system memory then your software is poorly written. Which Photoshop is.

    • @AmbientChaos
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The benefit of having unused RAM is that every program you are using can remain in memory for quick multitasking access and when you go to launch a new program it can be loaded into that unused RAM without unloading any of the currently running programs. What part about that is a misunderstanding? Would the user be better off if the application in focus aggressively reserved RAM it didn’t need to slow down every other running application? Because that’s what Photoshop does

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -62 months ago

        What part about that is a misunderstanding?

        The part where you assumed 20GB is 100% of OP’s RAM, leaving nothing for any other programs.