• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If they reversed it (displays inside), it would be the best immersive gaming setup ever.

    Edit: looks like they are inside.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Wait, the article says it’s “internal displays” but the picture shows images on the outside of the globe?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Never heard of him nor the sphere before. Excellent video that explains the sphere, made by an excellent YouTuber.
            Excellent recommendation!

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 months ago

                Hi is willing to commit to suffer so much for the most stupid and hilarious of quests like eating at every Margaritaville in the continental US. What a legend.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 months ago

          It’s got both. It’s awesome. But it’s also owned by James Dolan, and he’s a douche. I say that as a big Rangers fan.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -1
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The article says

          Those GPUs power 16 internal displays, each with a resolution of 16K, alongside 1.2 million programmable LED pucks coating the exterior of the sphere.

          Did you literally stop reading mid sentence? Or are you just not able to read good?

    • @n3m37h
      link
      English
      32 months ago

      Except it has the worst pixel density ever

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        9.818127340823 should be the pixel density if my numbers are correct.

        The numbers i was able to find(please correct if these numbers are not accurate)

        160,000 sqft display converted to inches 23040000 sq/inch

        16K x 16K resolution equals 15360 pixels x 15360 pixels So thats 235,929,600 pixels

        Various Notes.

        • a 55-inch 4K television, which has a pixel density of only 80.11ppi
        • iphone 12 - 360ppi
        • 14,000ppi MicroLED display is world’s densest, only 0.48mm across june 2019 approximately the size of a ladybug
        • @n3m37h
          link
          English
          12 months ago

          Thank you for confirming this, I’ll stick with my 109ppi 27" 1440p 165hz monitor

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            Not even close to the worst pixel per inch though. That would be probably a drone array in the sky im guessing assuming they could be made to stay perfectly in sync, ppi could be as bad as you wanted it lol. This does make me wonder what the extreme limits of ppi can be and still be usable. You would probably need to be on the moon or in space to be in the ideal viewing position. Having to acount for the limitation of the speed of light to produce the picture on that “display” would be an impressive feat of engineering.

            Did you really build a dyson sphere just to build a bigger tv? Yes yes i did

            Pixel pitch takes into account viewing distance.

            The displays in the sphere are 16K displays. They look insanely better than your monitor from the ideal spot in the venue.

            Their display has 64x more pixels than yours.

            • @n3m37h
              link
              English
              12 months ago

              Silence! I will hear none of this blasphemy! Fallout 76 does not have 16x the detail!