@[email protected] to PC [email protected] • 2 months agoPoll shows 84% of PC users unwilling to pay extra for AI-enhanced hardwarevideocardz.commessage-square149fedilinkarrow-up1685arrow-down17cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1678arrow-down1external-linkPoll shows 84% of PC users unwilling to pay extra for AI-enhanced hardwarevideocardz.com@[email protected] to PC [email protected] • 2 months agomessage-square149fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•2 months agoDo you have an article on that handy? I like reading about side channel and timing attacks.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink19•2 months agoTPM-FAIL from 2019. It affects Intel fTPM and some dedicated TPM chips: link The latest (at the moment) UEFI vulnerability, UEFIcanhazbufferoverflow is also related to, but not directly caused by, TPM on Intel systems: link
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•2 months agoThat’s insane. How can they be doing security hardware and leave a timing attack in there? Thank you for those links, really interesting stuff.
Do you have an article on that handy? I like reading about side channel and timing attacks.
TPM-FAIL from 2019. It affects Intel fTPM and some dedicated TPM chips: link
The latest (at the moment) UEFI vulnerability, UEFIcanhazbufferoverflow is also related to, but not directly caused by, TPM on Intel systems: link
That’s insane. How can they be doing security hardware and leave a timing attack in there?
Thank you for those links, really interesting stuff.