PS.

I would for vote Kamala. I would vote for a cactus with sunglasses if it had the Democratic nomination. You would do yourself well to consider anything that is weaking the resolve of the anti-trump sentiment straight poison to your brain. We have only one job this novemeber and that is to stop trump. The Supreme Court has given him the status of king. Quit acting like your vote is sacred and start realizing your vote is your final cry before your rights are forfeited.

  • @zalgotext
    link
    82 months ago

    “Fascism or genocide” is not going to cut it.

    That’s the choice we’ve been given though. Except it’s really more like “fascism AND genocide or just genocide”.

      • @zalgotext
        link
        32 months ago

        If you consider “throwing my vote away on a third party that doesn’t stand a chance in our shitty FPTP system” a choice, then sure I guess

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          02 months ago

          They may not win, but if you want to make a statement then third party is the option that is neither fascism nor genocide.

          • @zalgotext
            link
            12 months ago

            Ok, except if enough people vote third party, fascism will win. So I’m not sure that “statement” is a very strong one.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 months ago

              If enough votes 3rd party then maybe neither fascism nor genocide will win.

              You may even influence future american policy away from fascism/genocide

              • @zalgotext
                link
                12 months ago

                That’s a naive take at best. Until we have voting reform, 3rd parties don’t actually have a chance of winning anything. The only thing voting for a 3rd party accomplishes in our shitty FPTP system is pulling votes away from the Democratic option, making the chances better for the Republican option.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  That’s a naive take at best.

                  Dude, you are the one saying it’s either genocide or fascism.

                  Until we have voting reform, 3rd parties don’t actually have a chance of winning anything.

                  Agree, but winning isn’t the point you wanted to make. You wanted to avoid voting for genocide or fascism.

                  The only thing voting for a 3rd party accomplishes in our shitty FPTP system is pulling votes away from the Democratic option, making the chances better for the Republican option.

                  It sends a message to the democratic party that genocide isn’t an option, that the primary process is flawed and that you don’t belive Biden has a chance against Trump.

                  If you are sure Trump will win in your state, 3rd party is your best option.

                  If you are sure Biden will win in your state, 3rd party is your best option.

                  Only if you are in a swing state do you have to hold your nose and vote for genocide over fascism.

                  • @zalgotext
                    link
                    12 months ago

                    Dude, you are the one saying it’s either genocide or fascism.

                    Nah, that’s straight up incorrect, reread my first comment in this thread. The point I made there was that with Biden we get genocide, with Trump we get fascism and genocide.

                    Agree, but winning isn’t the point you wanted to make. You wanted to avoid voting for genocide or fascism.

                    No, I want to avoid voting for fascism, because we get genocide either way, and there’s nothing I can do about that.

                    It sends a message to the democratic party that genocide isn’t an option

                    Aww, it sends a message, how cute

                    Only if you are in a swing state do you have to hold your nose and vote for genocide over fascism.

                    Maybe my personal experience is biased because I’ve lived in a swing state my entire life, so voting third party has never been a productive option for me. But again, stop being disingenuous. My point has never been “genocide over fascism”, it’s very clearly always been “genocide over fascism and genocide”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -52 months ago

      A vote for dems is still a vote for fascism. They’ve got 3 bills right now in congress to stifle and delegitamize leftist organizations.

      What you mean is “disrupting my day to day life fascism and genocide or status quo fascism or genocide”

      • @zalgotext
        link
        42 months ago

        Ok now you’re just calling anything you disagree with “fascism”.

        Don’t take that the wrong way - I’m not trying to defend Democrats delegitamizing leftist organizations. But words have meaning, and when you just start throwing them around at everything that bothers you, you water down that meaning.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -22 months ago

          Thats just one example of many, regarding democrats exhibiting fascist behaviors and tendencies.

          This Insistence that we not call any behavior fascist or any long standing trends problematic until they’ve reached their final form and theres nothing to be done does way more damage than calling something what it is when it checks 4 out of 5 instead of all 5 boxes

          Being less overtly fascist than Project 2025 does not automatically make something not-fascist

          • @zalgotext
            link
            32 months ago

            You’re putting words in my mouth, on top of beating around the bush. Either say what you want to say directly, or don’t bother responding.

      • Schadrach
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 months ago

        They’ve got 3 bills right now in congress to stifle and delegitamize leftist organizations.

        Which bills are these?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -12 months ago

          I’m blanking on the third one at the moment but one is to streamline stripping nonprofit status of organizations that “support terrorism” (Palestine) and the other makes any criticism whatsoever of Israel legally antisemitic hate speech which again is largely going to affect leftist orgs but will also allow the board of education to strip funding and accreditation from colleges that allow pro-Palestinian protests.

          • Schadrach
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            and the other makes any criticism whatsoever of Israel legally antisemitic hate speech which again is largely going to affect leftist orgs but will also allow the board of education to strip funding and accreditation from colleges that allow pro-Palestinian protests.

            Reading this bil…

            This is the definition of antisemitism the bill adopts: https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism

            Since the bill applies this definition to title VI, it would apply to any organization receiving federal funds subject to title VI.

            Doesn’t count all criticism of Israel, you just can’t question it’s right to self determination, the validity or potential racism of a Jewish ethnostate, or levy any criticism that wouldn’t be leveled at literally any other nation in the same scenario. You also probably couldn’t speak Ill of AIPAC since that could be deemed demonizing Jews as collective.

            Can’t strip college accreditation, could strip federal funding - basically they’d be stuck operating under the same kind of restraints a college that doesn’t want to follow title IX does.

            I find it deeply amusing though that most of the people upset about this one would have been strongly in support of it prior to 10/7/23 as a move to fight white supremacy and neo-Nazis. If it was passed back then and been turned on students now it would have been a real “be careful what you wish for” moment.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 months ago

              Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic.

              How many other countries have situations that match the Israel/Palestinian conflict?

              The state of Israel doesn’t get to hide behind antisemitism. It is a system of governance, not a person, not a race, not a religion. It cannot be offended.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -12 months ago

              You can totally criticize Israel, just not for anything they do, say, or stand for.

              So glad I can say the shape of their country looks silly #freedom

              Really would have saved us all some time if you just said you were another right wing Zionist who wants to stamp out anything left of midright Biden.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 months ago

            I would label these as pro zionist bills.

            They have nothing to do with government provided public services.