mozz to politics @lemmy.world • 2 months agoAOC says many who want Joe Biden off ticket also want to remove Kamalawww.independent.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square409fedilinkarrow-up1539arrow-down130file-text
arrow-up1509arrow-down1external-linkAOC says many who want Joe Biden off ticket also want to remove Kamalawww.independent.co.ukmozz to politics @lemmy.world • 2 months agomessage-square409fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink13•2 months agoHe’ll be remembered fondly if he doesn’t fuck up this election (i.e. not stepping aside).
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•2 months agoBut what if he doesn’t step aside and wins reelection?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•edit-22 months agoPack it up bois, newnewaccount called it. We are done here. Instead of pissing about how it won’t happen go do something else why don’t you? Your usefulness here - Now - has run its course.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-22 months agoFor the millionth time: every time they’ve done it before, they lost in a landslide. NOT stepping aside is the marginally better play. And as a voter more on the DNC side of the floor, after the news today I weep for the next 40 years in America.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•2 months agoAll 2 times this happened before? If that’s the best argument you have for running a candidate that is clearly too old both for campaigning and for the presidency, I think I would take my chances for a third try.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•edit-22 months agoThe best play is to roll the die on a real progressive but there’s no data to back it up because there is no time to test it.
He’ll be remembered fondly if he doesn’t fuck up this election (i.e. not stepping aside).
But what if he doesn’t step aside and wins reelection?
Yeah that’d work too. But it won’t happen.
Pack it up bois, newnewaccount called it. We are done here.
Instead of pissing about how it won’t happen go do something else why don’t you? Your usefulness here - Now - has run its course.
For the millionth time: every time they’ve done it before, they lost in a landslide. NOT stepping aside is the marginally better play.
And as a voter more on the DNC side of the floor, after the news today I weep for the next 40 years in America.
All 2 times this happened before? If that’s the best argument you have for running a candidate that is clearly too old both for campaigning and for the presidency, I think I would take my chances for a third try.
The best play is to roll the die on a real progressive but there’s no data to back it up because there is no time to test it.
deleted by creator