@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 months agoThe percentage of the population who did/didn't know of Crowdstrike probably reversed in the past weekmessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1167arrow-down15
arrow-up1162arrow-down1message-squareThe percentage of the population who did/didn't know of Crowdstrike probably reversed in the past week@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 months agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•2 months ago“Cute, but no.” is accurate. You can calculate that in the shower. Showerthoughts isn’t an excuse to be dumb. Some of the people here are in the theme of “I didn’t mean ‘literally’ when I said ‘literally’”.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•edit-22 months agoSo the actual showerthought is what, “More people probably know about Crowdstrike now compared to last week?”
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•2 months agoBut that wouldn’t be worth posting. Might as well just make the title, “So… Crowdstrike, eh?”
“Cute, but no.” is accurate. You can calculate that in the shower. Showerthoughts isn’t an excuse to be dumb.
Some of the people here are in the theme of “I didn’t mean ‘literally’ when I said ‘literally’”.
So the actual showerthought is what, “More people probably know about Crowdstrike now compared to last week?”
But that wouldn’t be worth posting. Might as well just make the title, “So… Crowdstrike, eh?”