Hi all,

I’m seeing a lot of hate for capitalism here, and I’m wondering why that is and what the rationale behind it is. I’m pretty pro-capitalism myself, so I want to see the logic on the other side of the fence.

If this isn’t the right forum for a political/economic discussion-- I’m happy to take this somewhere else.

Cheers!

  • Dodecahedron December
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In a nutshell:

    Capitalism in theory is an ok idea. Capitalism left unchecked and largely unregulated (as is the case in america) evolves into a monster that controls government and the people in order to feed and sustain life. Or rather, companies do this.

    Sell things, make money. Pay labor a small amount to make more things. Labor complains, company buys good PR. Labor complains, company fires workers and hires more, buys more PR. Workers die, company sued, company buys good laywers, company pays small fine. Product is discovered as dangerous, company buys better science in the form of funding biased research. People start grassroots campaign to prevent product from being sold, company buys lobbyists to prevent grassroots campaign from working. Competitor starts doing better than company so company buys competitor, company now doubles in size and profit, can do twice the damage dealt previously.

    “Corporations are people, my friend” but they cannot vote. Company is founded in delaware like many other companies. Delaware now considering allowing corporations the right to vote as citizens would". Company loves this as it would save them money on lobbying.

    Company buys town, citizens move there and work for company in exchange for goods at the company store. Company store is the only store in town and they just raised their prices again for the third time in a month. Company considering statehood as next possible growth opportunity.

    Labor has less money and is increasingly overworked. Half of labor thinks the other half is lazy and that company will promote them because they feel they work harder than the other half. Promotions happen, but the increase barely keeps up with the cost of living. Technology improves, productivity soars, wages stagnate, CEO income compounds.

    Election season rolls around, a “CEO” type “business tycoon” is an option. The half of labor who think they will be promoted support the business tycoon candidate because they read reports of how much money he compounds. “My wages stagnated under the last guy, but this guy’s income compounds, exponentially! He surely knows how to save our country!” Business tycoon is elected and runs the country like a business, cutting costs where it helps anyone other than his own interests. Services people relied on are cut, people take on more stress and less income, the president denies all blame.

    Rinse, repeat.