After nearly a decade of being forced to take Trump seriously, Democrats increasingly call BS on the whole charade

Sure, Donald Trump is a threat to democracy — a would-be dictator on day one who has called for terminating the U.S. Constitution so he can hold onto power even after losing a free and fair election. But while draped in the rhetoric of populism, Trump and his MAGA movement are not actually popular; the man himself has never won more votes than the person he ran against, a majority of Americans twice rejecting him and his off-putting cult of personality. That he was ever president is more or less because a few thousand swing voters in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania thought it would be fun.

President Joe Biden won in 2020 largely by promising to a return to normalcy and baseline competency. In 2024, Democrats are making a similar argument but more forcibly: They’re pointing, laughing and dismissing Trump and his circus as a total freak show to which we can’t return.

  • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    promising to a return to normalcy and baseline competency.

    Here’s the thing. Biden hails from an era of politics where one would absolutely get lit up by the media for breaking decorum.

    It’s been a slow decline for some time, but the Republicans along with their propaganda outlet Fox News have slowly changed the country’s thermostat on this over the last few decades. Much like wearing a winter parka in the summer heat, maintaining complete and total political decorum in this climate is no longer a boon, it’s a handicap. We all saw Biden take one heck of a beating while taking the high road and never really taking the (rage) bait to hit back in quite the same way. But while that approach is performing on virtue, the optics are one of a punching bag in the eyes of many crucial voters.

    So tactics have been changed, and boy have they ever.

    What I appreciate about this approach is that it’s actually very light-handed, considering all that could be done. It also looks downright polite compared to how much right-wing media has run with hyperbole and even outright fabrication. Yet running on the rather casual sounding observation of “old and weird” is generating actual results. It’s also refreshing to loudly point out what we were all baffled about from the get-go: “Don’t they know? I mean, they’re seeing the same stuff we are, right?”

    I welcome this new shift to “bless your heart” politics.

    • Jax
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I welcome this new shift to “bless your heart” politics.

      This is the equivalent of pointing out grammatical errors in an otherwise logically sound argument. This is not a positive development, it is a sign that things are continuing to get worse.

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        logically sound argument

        Not even a little. Trump is wrong about what the problems are, and proposes “solutions” to the non-problems that we know will make them worse.

        Plus, he’s old and weird, and he running mate might be young-ish, but double-weird instead.

        • Jax
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Let me rephrase this.

          This is like pointing out grammatical errors in both a logical/illogical argument.

          You are either the person going ‘neener neener you misspelled a word’ to a person with a sound argument, or you’re stooping to the level of an idiot to defeat an idiot.

          If you cannot recognize why both are bad, I am not going to explain it to you.

          • FarmTaco@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Problem is you are pretending like the illogical argument didnt sit in office for 4 years.

            • Jax
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              No, I’m not, you’re reading into what I’ve said and think you’ve got me because you don’t understand what I’m (and by association, you’re) talking about.

              • FarmTaco@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’m sorry if you cant recognize the ridiculous strawman argument you put up, I’m not going to explain it to you.

                • Jax
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  Not a strawman lil guy, you just can’t read. Actually, the only strawman placed is the one you propped up.

                  • FarmTaco@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Hey cool, I unlocked the ‘attempt to win an argument by attacking the other person because i have no real standing’ part of the strawman. I wonder what happens next?

          • bss03@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Fascists don’t get civil debate. They get mocked, beaten, and ignored. If you don’t understand why I call people that are involved with Project 2025 “weird”, I’m not going to explain it to you, again.

            • Jax
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              The death of civil discourse, ladies and gentleman. Propagated by people who think they’re doing the right thing. The same people who are responsible for the complete lack of civil discourse online, who would have thought?

      • jaemo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        It is, in fact, not at all the equivalent of that. Get your lab equipment tested.