• Hegar
    link
    fedilink
    82 months ago

    The threat that chinese EVs pose to north american consumers has been vastly overblown by paranoid US nationalists and protectionist automakers who don’t fancy the competition. I’m not saying the chinese government is amazing no notes, just that this is a nothing issue.

    • m-p{3}
      link
      fedilink
      82 months ago

      I wish that cars in general had fewer reliance on electronic systems though, and some non-critical modules could be optionally disabled by the owner without rendering the car inoperable…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The boat has sailed on that one unfortunately.

        Safety requirements outright demand these things nowadays, and these safety things do save lives, of the occupants, pedestrians, and the other vehicles involved in the crash.

        • m-p{3}
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          I’m not talking about disabling safety systems though.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 months ago

            The safety systems require the cars to be what you don’t want and the requirements just keep increasing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 months ago

      @droopy4096 In addition to this, it’s well-reported now that several American automakers share vehicle acceleration data with insurance companies, so drivers are being monitored without their awareness and could face a hike in insurance fees if they’re detected as being a little too reckless in the passive acceleration data monitoring. I haven’t heard of any non-American automakers doing this. And while the consequences of the “Chinese government shutting down all EVs in NA via some electronic backdoor” are greater than this, one is speculation about the future and the other’s current fact