• @JohnDClay
    link
    English
    91 month ago

    Roman concrete would cure by reacting with the carbon dioxide in the air, fixing it into the concrete. It doesn’t sound like that’s how this concrete works, but I wonder if a methodology like that would be carbon negative.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 month ago

      For obvious reasons, I imagine that would only react on the surface level, and I’m willing to bet the CO2 generated in mining the materials, creating the concrete, and transporting the concrete outweigh some surface-level reactions with CO2.

      • @JohnDClay
        link
        English
        11 month ago

        Yeah you need to pour it differently, in thin layers. I’m guessing that extra time might make it too expensive?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      Roman methods are not how modern concrete is produced. As the article mentions, concrete production involves heating massive amounts, spewing loads of carbon dioxide & other toxins into the atmosphere.

      • @JohnDClay
        link
        English
        41 month ago

        That’s why I was proposing using the older method that would sequester CO2 instead of emitting it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          I dig it!

          Get back to the start with the stuff. Continue to study other ways utilize it in recycling/upcycling, but start with the carbon negative old ways at the core.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 month ago

      Isn’t the formula for Roman concrete unknown? I’m wondering how they can tell it is carbon negative