mozz to Data Is [email protected] • edit-21 month agoPresidential election popular vote tallies lined up against “did not vote”mbin.grits.devimagemessage-square119fedilinkarrow-up1480arrow-down121
arrow-up1459arrow-down1imagePresidential election popular vote tallies lined up against “did not vote”mbin.grits.devmozz to Data Is [email protected] • edit-21 month agomessage-square119fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink34•1 month agoThe percentages for 2016 only add up to 97, and the 40% bar is longer than the 41% of 2012.
minus-square@Klaymorelink19•edit-21 month agoMaybe 3% voted for a third party, and because they aren’t shown the other bars were expanded to fill the entire space
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink10•1 month agoThey could’ve done a little green sliver like they did for 1980.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•1 month agoLooks like '95 has 5% third party votes. The lower bound for visually representing votes here may be somewhere between 5% and 3% for the purposes of this graphic
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•1 month agoJust like the sub on reddit, the data in DataIsBeautiful apparently doesn’t actually have to be beautiful.
The percentages for 2016 only add up to 97, and the 40% bar is longer than the 41% of 2012.
Maybe 3% voted for a third party, and because they aren’t shown the other bars were expanded to fill the entire space
They could’ve done a little green sliver like they did for 1980.
Looks like '95 has 5% third party votes. The lower bound for visually representing votes here may be somewhere between 5% and 3% for the purposes of this graphic
Just like the sub on reddit, the data in DataIsBeautiful apparently doesn’t actually have to be beautiful.