Here we are - 3600 which was still under manufacture 2-3 years ago are not get patched. Shame on you AMD, if it is true.

  • conciselyverbose
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    My interpretation was by far the most generous to your position, because it’s the only way it’s coherent.

    If people bought [this hardware that doesn’t actually provide anything anyone can realistically use at a reasonable price] it might eventually not suck. That’s treating a current purchase as an imaginary investment in maybe eventually being able to buy something useful.

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      My interpretation was by far the most generous to your position, because it’s the only way it’s coherent.

      You’re entitled to your opinion, I guess.

      hardware that doesn’t actually provide anything anyone can realistically use

      Thats misrepresenting reality and making assumptions while clearly showing lack of expertise

      at a reasonable price

      Thats completely arbitrary. If a price is reasonable or not depends on many factors. Obvious oversymplification.

      That’s treating a current purchase as an imaginary investment in maybe eventually being able to buy something useful.

      This shows that you have no idea what you are talking about. Small companies and open source projects depend on people buying their products instead of cheaper, sometimes better performing products of big conglomerates for other reasons than price alone.

      • conciselyverbose
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Value is absolutely not arbitrary.

        “Reasonable” means comparable with x86/ARM at the same performance level. Anything more is, by definition, not capable of being reasonably priced.

        You’re again advocating for an imaginary investment in a bad product.