• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -11 month ago

    As many have pointed out, they have a publicly available method for determining bias. The method is not “look at who owns it and make a snap judgement”

    • @ayyy
      link
      01 month ago

      Yup and that same public methodology calls the Associated Press and Reuters lefty. They clearly just want to propagandize by shifting the Overton Window to the right with a thin veneer of “science” and a side of “y wont u debate me bro”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 month ago

        Or… shocking idea, the united states is far more conservative than most people on lemmy want it to be.

        • @ayyy
          link
          0
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Is that why they keep losing every popular vote and rely so heavily on gerrymandering and voter suppression?

          Edit: also way to admit the reason that you like the bot is because it’s got a conservative agenda.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            … wtf. Literally nothing about this makes sense. Especially this weird shit:

            way to admit the reason that you like the bot is because it’s got a conservative agenda.

            I implied the US is too conservative, that means, what, I am a trumper? Don’t comment if you have no fucking idea what’s being said.

            Hint, I am on Lemmy. You entirely made shit up in your head about what was implied by my statement

            I like the bot because it’s a decent attempt at calling out misinformation automatically. You hate it because you personally disagree with the formula and therefore assume it’s a conspiracy.