• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    231 month ago

    That would be great. I’m not sure how to solve the problems that arises though. If i can send an anonymous vote to an instance, what stops me from sending 100?
    Maybe there’s some smart cryptographical solution here that alludes me, but it seems hard, if possible.

        • @Socsa
          link
          English
          51 month ago

          This is literally already a problem. I can easily set up an instance and write a simple bot which just spams votes with randomized user strings. There are generally a bunch of these functional vulnerabilities in the AP trust model which are only mitigated by the current lack of scale. Work needs to be put into reworking the trust model, not exposing user telemetry to even more people.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 month ago

            I can easily set up an instance and write a simple bot which just spams votes with randomized user strings.

            Well you can do that for a little bit, until your instance gets found out and it gets defederated. And you need to pay for a new domain if you want to do it again. So the current system actually makes it cost real money to do this spam you’re talking about.

            • @Socsa
              link
              English
              31 month ago

              Sure, but the detection and enforcement mechanism would be the same as it is now.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            well, since the voting is public it’s easy to remove your votes and block your instance after the fact

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Each instance could store a static private key used to encrypt all usernames in that instance maybe?