• BatrickPateman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      Was that the bot that just cut paragraphs from an article to shorten them, mangling context beyond comprehension in the process?

      • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I rarely had that problem from the bot. Reading from it at least gave me more information and saved me a click without having to be bombarded with cookie notices and requests to subscribe to a newsletter.

      • illi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        So… how do I opt in to see the bot in the comments?

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        When it comes to tools that help you stay informed, I’d say the opposite is true.

        If one wants to maintain ignorance, they should have to do so at their own inconvenience.

        • Aurenkin
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Which tool is helping us stay informed?

          • Mechanize@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Considering you seem to dislike the whole concept of Bots, isn’t the Bot toggle in the Lemmy profile exactly what you want?

            It auto ignores all posts and comments made by accounts marked as Bots. Sure, the owner of the account has to correctly mark it, but I feel that can easily be solved by reporting unmarked bots.

            But I’m interested, if you would like to expand on it, how would you make a bot opt-in?
            The only way I could think of is through PMs, but that would be cumbersome, and generally unfit for purpose, for all the involved parties.

              • tyler@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                You have no measurement of any bot’s popularity. You’re just making the claim without proof.

              • saltesc@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Ah, I see. We should just pass all bots through you for approval first.

                Sorry, everyone else. I know some of you liked that bot, but wazoobonkerbrain doesn’t, so it’s switched off due to “popularity reasons”. If you want to experience open internet, you’ll have to find somewhere else.

          • Zorque@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            3 months ago

            Whether they are effective or not is definitely in question, but they are unquestionably intended to be informative. If they irritate you, you have the ability to exercise your right to block them.

            You being annoyed at something you don’t like isn’t a reason to not have it.

              • ayyy
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Here’s the thread that’s full to the brim with evidence of bias. Read it for yourself instead of listening to the liar that replied to you.

                • tyler@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  This user is literally lying about what the thread contains! holy shit the level of gaslighting and misinformation is insane! How can you function!?!?!

                  • ayyy
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Yup, I’m the gaslighter, not the person calling the Associated Press leftist.

              • tyler@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                3 months ago

                That thread was filled with people downvoting anyone who even attempted to disagree. It was also full of people claiming bias and then not backing it up with a single source, link to offending pages, etc. so yeah no wonder it was full of people saying they hated it. Anyone who said otherwise (like myself) got fucking reamed.

                • ayyy
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Here’s the thread that’s full to the brim with evidence of bias. Read it for yourself instead of listening to this liar.

                  • tyler@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    There’s literally not a single link in that thread with any evidence, maybe you should go read it yourself.

      • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        not really. there is no good way for people to know what bots are available. if they had a bots section in the settings where you could turn them on then maybe.