• conciselyverbose
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    Go to some junk instance that’s willing to federate if you want.

    Federating with Threads makes an instance unacceptable as far as most of us are concerned. Their mere existence is malignant.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      Go to some junk instance that’s willing to federate if you want.

      The Mastodon instance I use already does and absolutely nothing negatively happened to it. Mastodon users can just block entire instances on their own if they happen to not like any content from there.

      Federating with Threads makes an instance unacceptable as far as most of us are concerned. Their mere existence is malignant.

      That’s based on conspiracy theories and not an actually informed decision based on how the Fediverse works. Most of you don’t even understand that Threads content wouldn’t even show up on Lemmy in the first place. Threads doesn’t even have communities.

      • conciselyverbose
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Because Facebook hasn’t done anything yet.

        Blocking Facebook as a user is not good enough. Any server that connects to them legitimizes them and is not acceptable behavior.

        It absolute is not a conspiracy, and most people unwilling to participate in any server that interacts with Facebook in any way are doing so exactly because they understand the technology and Facebook’s history. Literally everything Facebook has ever touched turned to dogshit. “I won’t participate in a platform that doesn’t completely block Facebook” is not the naive, uninformed position. (That’s using Facebook and their other platforms.) It’s the people who recognize how pure fucking evil Facebook is.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          3 months ago

          Because Facebook hasn’t done anything yet.

          And they cannot circumvent to ActivityPub protocol to display ads to users who don’t want so see them. Claiming otherwise is conspiracy theories.

          Blocking Facebook as a user is not good enough

          Yes, it is.

          Any server that connects to them legitimizes them and is not acceptable behavior.

          That’s not for you to decide.

          It absolute is not a conspiracy

          It absolutely is.

          and most people unwilling to participate in any server that interacts with Facebook in any way

          First: That’s untrue.

          Second: Such an opinion is based on conspiracy theories and therefore not valid.

          are doing so exactly because they understand the technology

          No, they and you don’t.

          “I won’t participate in a platform that doesn’t completely block Facebook” is not the naive, uninformed position.

          Yes, it is and you don’t even realize that you are participatin in a platform that doesn’t completely block Facebook Threads right now. That’s proof enough that you don’t understand the technology.

          It’s the people who recognize how pure fucking evil Facebook is.

          Then allowing ad-free access to accounts hosted there should be your agenda. That’s how they don’t get money, not by pushing people to sign up for their platform, just because they want to follow their favorite movie franchise or sports team.

          • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes, it is and you don’t even realize that you are participatin in a platform that doesn’t completely block Facebook Threads right now. That’s proof enough that you don’t understand the technology.

            https://sh.itjust.works/instances lists threads.net under the blocked instances list, not everyone is using lemmy.world. Inform yourself before accusing others of making uninformed statements.

            • woelkchen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              https://sh.itjust.works/instances lists threads.net under the blocked instances list, not everyone is using lemmy.world. Inform yourself before accusing others of making uninformed statements.

              But you’re in an lemmy.word-hosted community right now, interacting with me who has a LW account, so you’re participating on a platform that’s federating with Threads. That’s like claiming not to participate with anything Google while mailing these claims to GMail addresses. You’re participating. You just don’t know how ActivityPub works and that’s why you think that being on any Fediverse server that didn’t explicitly block Threads would result in sposored posts from Threads magically showing up. You’re a conspiracy theorist.

              • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                You very obviously do not understand how the blocklist works so here’s a very practical example:

                ani.social is blocked by lemmy.ml.

                Here is a post on lemmy.world containing comments by users from ani.social: https://lemmy.world/post/18538115

                Here is that same post on lemmy.ml, which has blocked ani.social: https://lemmy.ml/post/19043133

                Note the absence of any comment made by a user on ani.social. As far as users on lemmy.ml are concerned ani.social does not exist (as of 10 months ago, some existing content before then can still be viewed). I think you don’t know how ActivityPub works and calling me a conspiracy theorist won’t change that.

          • Jimbo@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            yes, it is

            It absolutely is

            No, they and you don’t

            What great arguments you have. Really gonna convince people with that.

            • woelkchen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              3 months ago

              What great arguments you have.

              Yes, I have, you just chose not to quote any of them. Threads cannot push ads to Mastodon users who don’t want to see them. Mastoton users can subscribe to brand accounts who then may make promotional posts but again: Threads cannot push any of those to users as ads. That’s simply not how ActivityPub works. I explained this countless times already. Certain people just aren’t interested in facts and choose to quote selectively as if those arguments were never made. That’s dishonest.