The super privacy-focused third-party ROM, GrapheneOS now officially supports the Google Pixel 9, 9 Pro, and 9 Pro XL.

    • @evo
      link
      English
      1222 days ago

      Because it’s proprietary software. They have an open source model (based off it) called Gemma but Gemini Nano is super locked down. There aren’t even public APIs for 3rd party developers to use it through the OS yet.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        222 days ago

        An enormous portion of Google’s products are proprietary and yet still made freely available to anyone.

        • @evo
          link
          English
          521 days ago

          None of those are cutting edge AI models that could be ripped open and examined if people had access to the files. It’s not just an app or something, there are internal trade secrets at risk.

            • @evo
              link
              English
              121 days ago

              That is basically what you get if you have direct access to the LLM file(s).

                • @evo
                  link
                  English
                  021 days ago

                  Locked away in the stock ROM. Almost certainly encrypted at rest.

    • Noxious
      link
      fedilink
      -122 days ago

      Because Google is a monopolistic piece of shit and they try to lock you in to their shitty, privacy-invasive ecosystem. In my opinion it’s like a hundred times worse than Apple. Only Google hardware (phones and tablets) are worth buying, but only for the strong hardware security features, definitely not for the stupid proprietary software they come with by default.

          • Avid Amoeba
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            22 days ago

            Not to mention that even with the stock OS you can disable most if not all sniffing components. Of course Google still has root but they don’t put their typically don’t embed obfuscated stuff because they don’t need to.

            Note that I’m not arguing that Google isn’t privacy invasive “because you can turn it all off.” The user shouldn’t have to go through this trouble to recover their privacy and the user experience definitively degrades if you do.

        • Avid Amoeba
          link
          fedilink
          English
          622 days ago

          Definitely high. It’s pretty funny how people manufactured this privacy perception and projected it over Apple. Apple was happy to capitalize on it and keep it going. Reminds me of the security perception over BlackBerry. Hot air either way.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -121 days ago

            I mean Apple is certainly more private than stock Android of any flavor, but Google at least gives you the option to take a bunch of that privacy back.