@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 23 days agoBecoming et al.mander.xyzimagemessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1692arrow-down16
arrow-up1686arrow-down1imageBecoming et al.mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 23 days agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-squareMiles O'BrienlinkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-223 days agoLiterally even a spot bumped out on the end where they list everyone, at the very end of the paper, would be infinitely better than “et Al” Uhhhhhh Yeah I have no defense for this other than having a dumb moment. Carry on… please
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish15•23 days agoThat’s what bibliography is. It’s already like that, or am I missing something?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•23 days agoIt sounds like you’re talking about the references, which already list all authors
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-222 days agoThen what’s the issue? Sounds to me like papers already have comprehensive credits. Is the issue that it’s displayed in two places, so people don’t bother to check out the second?
Literally even a spot bumped out on the end where they list everyone, at the very end of the paper, would be infinitely better than “et Al”Uhhhhhh
Yeah I have no defense for this other than having a dumb moment.
Carry on… please
That’s what bibliography is. It’s already like that, or am I missing something?
It sounds like you’re talking about the references, which already list all authors
Then what’s the issue? Sounds to me like papers already have comprehensive credits.
Is the issue that it’s displayed in two places, so people don’t bother to check out the second?