• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 days ago

    The headline saying progressives are ok with it is bullshit.

    But if stupid headlines broke any rules, there’d be a lot less posts here.

    This one will likely stay up

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      -4
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      That’s the headline from the article and I’m not allowed to change it. I ended up having to copy paste it as the automatic import did not work, so I suppose the title tag could be different. I can’t quite tell on my phone.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -322 days ago

        Nah. I meant it’s not your fault it’s a dumb headline, it’s the journalist/editor who picked it.

        I should have explicitly said that to be clear tho considering how much hassle you’ve went thru to get a post in

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            -222 days ago

            My preconceived notion is that people should fight for the things they believe in and not just shift their beliefs because the money said so. Strange, I know.

            • Blackbeard
              link
              fedilink
              English
              322 days ago

              My preconceived notion is that people shouldn’t amplify misleading headlines. That goes doubly for people who criticize misleading headlines when the shoe is on the other foot.

              • @[email protected]OP
                link
                fedilink
                -222 days ago

                It’s not misleading if I provide a date in the body, one is provided in the article/blog and the candidate totally said all of that. I’m not allowed to change the title, so how am I otherwise supposed to compensate for a lack of reading comprehension?