return2ozma@lemmy.world to A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world · 2 months agoSupreme Court refuses to revive Biden's latest student loan debt relief planwww.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1205arrow-down14cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1201arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court refuses to revive Biden's latest student loan debt relief planwww.nbcnews.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square23fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squareMyOpinion@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up137·2 months agoThe president is free to kill his opponents, but he can’t forgive debt? Your corruption is showing Supreme Court.
minus-squareTropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up61arrow-down13·2 months ago The president is free to kill his opponents, but he can’t forgive debt? Your corruption is showing Supreme Court. So Biden could just dismiss the debt and say it was an official act. To be clear, he simply lacks the will.
minus-squareWraithGear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up40arrow-down1·2 months agoThe Supreme Court gets to decide what is an official act. And he can’t dismiss supreme court’s justices… however…
minus-squareExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up26·2 months ago And he can’t dismiss supreme court’s justices… But he can have them wasted now.
minus-squareThatuserguy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up24·edit-22 months agoIf he takes out the supreme court, it doesn’t seem there’s anyone left to disagree ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
minus-squarebizarroland@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up11·2 months agoThe people that replace them may have some strongly worded opin… Okay well maybe the person who replaces that one will… Yeah looks like the supreme Court is fine with it
minus-squarebaldingpudenda@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoI’m just a pleb, but wouldn’t his official acts be legal. It was ruled as legal, he killed them, then the new justice ruled it unconstitutional.
minus-squareduckduckohno@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoHe can dismiss them illegally and say it was an official act…
minus-squareMyOpinion@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down1·2 months agoThat is exactly what he should do. Then dismiss any Justice who disagrees with him as an official act as well.
minus-squareImplyingImplications@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up12·2 months agoThe ruling was that the president is immune from criminal punishment over offical acts not that the president can pass any laws they want.
minus-squareSnot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agoArguably, passing a law without congress would be an unofficial act and breaking the law. At that point, he could be impeached, and after impeachment, charged with a crime related to the impeachment.
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoWho determines whether it’s an unofficial act? The same judges with the same fascist bias?
minus-squareFlashMobOfOne@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 months agoExactly. He’s already unilaterally cancelled bits of student debt for several categories of people. The SCOTUS is just giving him cover.
The president is free to kill his opponents, but he can’t forgive debt? Your corruption is showing Supreme Court.
So Biden could just dismiss the debt and say it was an official act. To be clear, he simply lacks the will.
The Supreme Court gets to decide what is an official act. And he can’t dismiss supreme court’s justices… however…
But he can have them wasted now.
If the Supreme Court agrees.
If he takes out the supreme court, it doesn’t seem there’s anyone left to disagree ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The people that replace them may have some strongly worded opin…
Okay well maybe the person who replaces that one will…
Yeah looks like the supreme Court is fine with it
I’m just a pleb, but wouldn’t his official acts be legal. It was ruled as legal, he killed them, then the new justice ruled it unconstitutional.
He can dismiss them illegally and say it was an official act…
That is exactly what he should do. Then dismiss any Justice who disagrees with him as an official act as well.
The ruling was that the president is immune from criminal punishment over offical acts not that the president can pass any laws they want.
Arguably, passing a law without congress would be an unofficial act and breaking the law.
At that point, he could be impeached, and after impeachment, charged with a crime related to the impeachment.
Who determines whether it’s an unofficial act? The same judges with the same fascist bias?
Exactly.
He’s already unilaterally cancelled bits of student debt for several categories of people.
The SCOTUS is just giving him cover.