So…yeah. Looking at file size, it clearly beats older 264 or even 265. I don’t mind if my server is going to have to transcode for most clients, I think the size difference in size might be worth it. But not sure which groups I could focus to look for these AV1 releases, seem they’re quite scarce still?

  • can
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    What’s wrong with FLAC?

    • ReedReads@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Nothing. It’s just that you don’t see people use flac very often as an audio codec for movies or TV series. At least I haven’t seen it very often.

      The only issue would be if you were trying to transcode Dolby Digital to flac. That is not a transcode you want to do.

      • can
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        That is not a transcode you want to do.

        Why is that?

            • ferret
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              It’s extra wasted space because compression artifacts are hard to compress lossless. It’s a shit sandwich, so people advise against it.

          • can
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I didnt realise* that they were lossy. Makes sense now.