@[email protected] to [email protected] • 21 days agoI was only gone for a day or two...locklemmy.worldimagemessage-square790fedilinkarrow-up1636arrow-down125
arrow-up1611arrow-down1imageI was only gone for a day or two...locklemmy.world@[email protected] to [email protected] • 21 days agomessage-square790fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-4•20 days agoOh no, I’m just so used to that stupid “question” or “statement” that it’s become obvious it’s absolutely meaningless. My answer is this: You’re paying for them to kill the next one. So “already dead” is ignorant if you don’t know how linear time works.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•20 days agoit’s a legitimate objection unless you can show causation
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-2•20 days agoYou should use your knowledge in words for something productive instead.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•20 days agoif you don’t have evidence for your position, that is good reason to suspect it is not valid. a claim made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence, after all.
Oh no, I’m just so used to that stupid “question” or “statement” that it’s become obvious it’s absolutely meaningless.
My answer is this: You’re paying for them to kill the next one. So “already dead” is ignorant if you don’t know how linear time works.
it’s a legitimate objection unless you can show causation
You should use your knowledge in words for something productive instead.
if you don’t have evidence for your position, that is good reason to suspect it is not valid. a claim made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence, after all.