Although I agree with this bill, the NYT calling it “strict new ethics rules” is a bit much. Reading the requirements in the bill itself, it struck me as legislating that SCOTUS justices do the bare ethical minimum required of most every other judge - in other words, it’s the type of bill that shows up when an organization demonstrates that it is incapable of self-policing.
What’s shocking is 100% opposition by Republicans to a bill requiring a Justice to recuse if a close family member receives a large gift from a litigant - literally, that’s in the bill.
How is this controversial? Senator Graham says why - requiring the court to act ethically will “destroy” the court. He’s saying, we don’t care if justices are ethical so long as they’re partisan.
Congress needs to step up here.
On par for the state of our politics today. Republicans opposition to anything proposed by the Democrats. NYT framing something in a bad faith way to maintain the status quo to protect their business and businesses in general. The democratic giving bread crumbs that should be the bare minimum just to run on. In a more optimistic note it’s something in the right direction. We need representation that has our best interests in mind.