SAO PAULO (AP) — Elon Musk’s satellite-based internet service provider Starlink backtracked Tuesday and said it will comply with a Brazilian Supreme Court justice’s order to block the billionaire’s social media platform, X.

Starlink said in a statement posted on X that it will heed Justice Alexandre de Moraes’ order despite him having frozen the company’s assets. Previously, it informally told the telecommunications regulator that it would not comply until de Moraes reversed course.

“Regardless of the illegal treatment of Starlink in freezing our assets, we are complying with the order to block access to X in Brazil,” the company statement said. “We continue to pursue all legal avenues, as are others who agree that @alexandre’s recent order violate the Brazilian constitution.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1714 days ago

    You can’t operate a business that doesn’t comply with the law. They don’t get a free pass just because their business is a communication service.

    • @ayyy
      link
      -614 days ago

      Yes but it’s a law that is used for internet censorship.

        • @ayyy
          link
          114 days ago

          Yes, that’s what is happening here.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            114 days ago

            Not really, as X refused to argue it in court, the place where this argument should have taken place.

            Whatever we Lemmings think about this ruling is unimportant to the actual rulers. We can argue about that till we’re blue in the face, but it won’t change a thing. So it’s pointless.

            X had a chance to assount legal representation. They refused, and as a consequence, the entire website got blocked. It’s their own fault.

      • trevor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        314 days ago

        You can’t open a restaurant that doesn’t comply with food safety law. This is a “skill issue” on Musk’s part. Not censorship.

        • @ayyy
          link
          014 days ago

          Nobody here ever said otherwise.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            514 days ago

            Is shutting down a restaurant because it doesn’t comply with food safety restaurant censorship?

            • @ayyy
              link
              014 days ago

              No? I don’t understand the point you’re trying to make to me by naming dumb stuff that isn’t censorship.