@[email protected]M to FairVote [email protected]English • 14 days agoWe need to have a better systemlemmy.caimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1313arrow-down13
arrow-up1310arrow-down1imageWe need to have a better systemlemmy.ca@[email protected]M to FairVote [email protected]English • 14 days agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squareFiveMacslinkfedilink6•14 days agoWhat if no party recieved 50% or more and everyone is under, then what?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•14 days ago a coalition is made. And if one party is opposed to the concept of coalitions or even cooperating with othe rparteis?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•13 days agoIf your party fundamentally doesn’t want to participate in a coalition, they don’t want to govern, they just want power. As a rule, don’t vote for people that don’t want to govern and just want power.
minus-square@Timecirclelinelink1•13 days agoThat’s a good rule. It’s a shame you can’t tell people how to vote though, really.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•12 days agoI agree, but the CPC has other ideas, and the pundits seem to think it’s inevitable that they’ll win the next election.
What if no party recieved 50% or more and everyone is under, then what?
Run off elections or ranked choice voting. fairvote.org
Than a coalition is made.
And if one party is opposed to the concept of coalitions or even cooperating with othe rparteis?
If your party fundamentally doesn’t want to participate in a coalition, they don’t want to govern, they just want power.
As a rule, don’t vote for people that don’t want to govern and just want power.
That’s a good rule. It’s a shame you can’t tell people how to vote though, really.
I agree, but the CPC has other ideas, and the pundits seem to think it’s inevitable that they’ll win the next election.
Another election could be called
Then they should have won more of the vote.