@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 11 days agoLadies and Gentlemen, the sate of AI.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square116fedilinkarrow-up1951arrow-down133
arrow-up1918arrow-down1imageLadies and Gentlemen, the sate of AI.lemmy.world@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 11 days agomessage-square116fedilink
minus-square@sugar_in_your_tealinkEnglish7•10 days agoSure, but AI didn’t say that. It said: XTX > XT, get XT.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•10 days agoThe AI response reads like when you are looking for something in Reddit and you get 3 very different responses in 3 different threads about the same topic
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•10 days agoYep, my comment was tongue in cheek. It’s a useless result and only sort of makes sense as an overly reduced summary that has lost vital context. The other reply is the obvious answer. Each answer is from a different viewpoint from a different user.
Sure, but AI didn’t say that. It said: XTX > XT, get XT.
The AI response reads like when you are looking for something in Reddit and you get 3 very different responses in 3 different threads about the same topic
Yep, my comment was tongue in cheek. It’s a useless result and only sort of makes sense as an overly reduced summary that has lost vital context.
The other reply is the obvious answer. Each answer is from a different viewpoint from a different user.