• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3514 days ago

    The fascist says ‘Meet me in the middle!’

    You take 1 step forward.

    The fascist takes 2 steps backwards and says ‘Meet me in the middle!’.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5014 days ago

      The shifting of the Overton window is real and an important part of the American Republican playbook.

      However the above commenter is not talking about American Republicans, they’re talking about the purity culture among leftists that prevents them from voting for left leaning liberals.

      In the current election the choices are 1 step to the left or 50 yards to the right, and because it’s not 2 steps to the left they refuse to vote.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1414 days ago

        I don’t disagree, but I think the attitude comes from exhaustion at the Democrats spending 50 years meeting Republicans in the middle and telling more left leaning groups that their desires aren’t as important or that they’re at fault for Democrats losing because they scared off some mythical right leaning centrist who would have otherwise voted for the Democrats.

        Plus, I’m not convinced that a large part of the not voting bloc that you hear online isn’t actually just a disenfranchisement campaign.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          714 days ago

          I agree on the not-voting bloc - I’d also add that the zealotry I’ve seen, the black and white thinking… All of it reminds me more of religious fundamentalist groups than it does of the progressives I know.

          • @Rekorse
            link
            2
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            Keep in mind that from state to state the amount of people who would be able to vote but have been restricted ranges from near 0% to 8%.

            The three worst states are Alabama, Tennessee, and Mississippi.

            It obviously doesnt account for all of the non voters but its still substantial.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              314 days ago

              In this case when we’re talking about “non-voter” it’s about the uncommitted movement, not about the deliberately disenfranchised.

              The Republican party is thrilled with the uncommitted movement and has done as much as possible to push for their success.

              It’s not that I disagree with the uncommitted movement in principle: I hope that their push brings about real change. They are useful to the Republican party nonetheless, and if key battleground states like Michigan are lost because of them it will be a major blow to any hope of incremental change.

              The Democratic party has to be the big tent party because the Republicans are the party of narrow minded bigotry. That does mean that there will always be leftists dissatisfied with the DNC.

              When that dissatisfaction leads to “cutting off your own nose to spite your face” behavior is when the leftist purity culture becomes a problem.

              • @Rekorse
                link
                112 days ago

                Well we do have to respect peoples vote no matter how they use it. Its possible for a small percentage their life won’t change no matter who wins, so why not vote for your favorite candidate?

                I do think a majority of the uncommitted voter base from last election is no longer uncommitted because Trump is bad for more groups of people this time around.

                I just don’t think its razor thin enough that people are no longer free to vote their preference. In my opinion trump won’t come close to winning.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        313 days ago

        The options are 50 yards to the right or 5 feet to the right, but fuck me for wanting someone to even look to the left.

        Obligatory: I’m voting for the D, at least the VP pick is aware of the left.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        314 days ago

        That’s fair, I don’t live in America. I live in a country where I can vote for “spoiler” parties and it actually does take power away from center parties. The issue seems more generally relevant here.

          • @Rekorse
            link
            114 days ago

            Sort of. Vulnerable in that its possible to get a small foothold sometimes. Ebb and flow.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          212 days ago

          If a party is viable they strictly speaking aren’t a spoiler. 3rd party wise in the US. 3rd party candidates in local elections are great. In my state there are plenty of offices Republicans run for uncontested. I would vote sight unseen for any non Republican aligned candidate running against them.

          National elections… 3rd parties running here can’t help but be spoilers. First there’s 50 separate sub elections they have to qualify for in the first place. Most don’t even qualify for half that at best. So they’ve already lost. Then on the off chance they somehow won one.(never really happened in 250 years) There’s the EC system and delegates. Some states are winner take all, some proportional. And while they’re supposed to vote to represent the states population. Faithless electors are a thing. Meaning 3rd parties just lost harder.

          Its something like a .00000001% chance with an over 6 sigma confidence rating. You have better odds of getting struck by lightning multiple times while dancing the Macarena.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        313 days ago

        and what makes you think we dont vote for left leaning liberals, when its literally the only option?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -414 days ago

        Bahahahahahajah what??? All the Dems and the left have done is compromise and hold their nose to vote for the lesser of 2 evils…

        What the fuck are you smoking???