🍹Early to RISA 🧉M to Greentext • 13 days agoAnon pregamesimagemessage-square138arrow-up1397arrow-down117
arrow-up1380arrow-down1imageAnon pregames🍹Early to RISA 🧉M to Greentext • 13 days agomessage-square138
minus-square@festntlink2•12 days agothats not really helpful, could you explain to me where i was wrong? i dont mean to sound like “i know im right” or something. i actually just want to know
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•12 days agoExtremely drunk people are not in the state of mind to consent
minus-square@festntlink4•11 days agobut if they got drunk knowing what they were drinking (like not being drugged or something similar) and commit a crime, they can still be liable, right?
minus-square@festntlink1•9 days agoboth things are crimes commited while drunk, and i believe in both instances the person is liable for commiting the crime.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•9 days agoMaybe I’m missing the point. I thought we were talking about consent, and now one cannot give consent while very drunk.
Yikes…
thats not really helpful, could you explain to me where i was wrong?
i dont mean to sound like “i know im right” or something. i actually just want to know
Extremely drunk people are not in the state of mind to consent
but if they got drunk knowing what they were drinking (like not being drugged or something similar) and commit a crime, they can still be liable, right?
How is that relevant?
both things are crimes commited while drunk, and i believe in both instances the person is liable for commiting the crime.
Maybe I’m missing the point. I thought we were talking about consent, and now one cannot give consent while very drunk.
i was talking about how she was sexually assaulting the guy