• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12410 days ago

    Only the salary ranges for a position become public. They aren’t going to publish what they pay each employee.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6710 days ago

      And if it’s anything like California the ranges will be useless. My salary “range” is quoted as $80k - $170k. Real fucking useless.

      • Lad
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1810 days ago

        My salary is between $1 and $10000000

        • slazer2au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3010 days ago

          $81K because they have 5 years experience in a technology that has been out for 3 years.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        810 days ago

        I’ve looked at some California ranges. They tend to be well below what levels.fyi claims these companies pay (I’m thinking Netflix, Microsoft, Google).

        I’m assuming they lowball the range in the ad so if they get a candidate that doesn’t fit the original criteria they were thinking of but they still want to onboard, they can pay less. If they get a candidate that they really like, maybe they’ll pay more? I know we’re supposed to be all doom and gloom here, but there’s plenty of folks making ludicrous salaries in tech.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      79 days ago

      Thats true, you can ask the average salary for the role within the firm though. Having seen the pisstaking done in America with ranges, they got out ahead of it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 days ago

      I assume there may be some cutoff point, but what if you have a low number of people in the role say for example 2. Wouldn’t that be pretty much narrowing it down to being per employee?